For any project to sustain in a predictive way to ensure the core 3 triangles of scope, time and budget remains predicted, there must be a structure to see beyond numbers. Unlike many others – we don’t just look at numbers.
The aim of the review is to measure to the “Completeness” and the Experience.
To do so, we involve key stakeholders who drive the project as well as some of the neutral but well experienced members from other teams to take a look at the results and eliviate the project situation to a greater satisfaction level.
We know an internal review gives us on side of the picture. However, successful offshore projects always require client attention, especially when you’re measuring success or failiure.
With clients involved in such an evaluation, the team can also get to know some of the risks from client end too which generally are not shared initially.
Planning based on current situation is more relevant than a plan that set from day 1 of the project – allowing adaptibility and practical approach.
By ensuring the engineers and designers are the team on the ground, and when they have predictive results to produce, the quality becomes better.